Freedom Convoy Leaders Face Trial, Canadian Institutions in Spotlight

Prominent figures in the “Freedom Convoy” demonstration, Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, lay in wait to face criminal charges for their involvement in the significant upheaval that paralyzed Ottawa last year. Their appearance in court is just the tip of the iceberg in a case that sees much more than the deeds of two protest influencers on trial.

Lich and Barber, who played instrumental roles in organizing the movement that knocked on Ottawa’s door in early 2022, are set to be the inaugural members of the executive panel to grace the dock on September 5. The spotlight will undoubtedly linger, scrutinizing other actors involved.

TRUSTED PARTNER ✅

Lawrence Greenspon, who has stepped up to represent Lich, voiced his plea in court during the summer, emphasising the need to keep the focus honed in on the case at hand. “This should not be the trial of the ‘Freedom Convoy,”‘ he argued.

Regardless, University of Ottawa criminologist Michael Kempa cautioned that the trial’s publicity might situate Canadian institutions under the microscope, with their handling of the case and the ensuing reputation it could shape hanging in the balance.

Ostensibly against COVID-19 restrictions and the government led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, the “Freedom Convoy” saw thousands of people resist leaving downtown Ottawa for a period spanning three weeks. Local executives deemed it an occupation, while other parties staged blockades at several U.S. border crossings.

For the first time in the annals of history, the Liberal government invoked the Emergencies Act, announcing a national public order emergency. Justice Paul Rouleau, leading an inquiry into the decision, deemed this an unmatched moment in historical timelines.

The convoy incident revealed Canada’s societal fissures, noted Kempa. This schism was palpable between those who sympathized with the protestors to a considerable degree and those wholeheartedly opposed to the movement. Faith in societal institutions appeared to diminish during this tumultuous period, indicated by a recent Statistics Canada survey revealing only 45.8% of Canadians expressed significant confidence in the justice system in late 2022.

Lich and Barber, arrested on the last day of the protest before police intervention came into full force, are levied with charges of mischief, obstructing law enforcement, instigating others to cause disruptions, and intimidation. The pair maintain the protest was a spontaneous uprising, lacking a distinct leader.

Lich, a resident of Alberta, and Barber, a trucking firm owner based in Saskatchewan, believe their case will set a precedent for others. “The court must demonstrate fair treatment to both sides of this political divide,” Lich asserted.

Following her arrest, Tamara Lich was detained for a period of 49 days, exhibiting a perceived failure on the court’s part, according to Keith Wilson, Lich’s legal counsel during the protest. However, despite a potential decade-long sentence looming, Superior Court Justice Andrew Goodman voiced concerns that Lich might already have spent more time under preliminary custody than she would serve even if found guilty.

The trials which are expected to span at least 16 days bring to focus the apparent neglect in police preparedness and response that contributed to the amplified severity of the protests. Both supporters and detractors are keenly anticipating the verdict, a decision that is likely to echo in the annals of Canadian protest history.