Fact-Checking Takes Center Stage as GOP Hopefuls Debate Amid Trump’s Absence


In an eye-catching diplomatic spectacle that unfolded on a recent Wednesday night in California, seven hopefuls from the Republican presidential front gathered to debate pressing issues. Notably absent from the political jamboree, former President Donald Trump opted to address a Michigan crowd in the midst of a local autoworkers’ strike.

Delving into diverse topics such as the border wall, Florida’s education curriculum, the economy, and the war in Ukraine, the candidates took turns to air their views. Unfortunately, some of them skewed, rather than illuminate the facts, leading to a maze of misinformation.

Follow us on Google News! ✔️

Case in point was the discord between former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and former Vice President Mike Pence on the matter of the border wall. According to Christie, Trump had pledged to build “a wall across the whole border,” yet only managed to erect 52 miles. Pence, however, presented a much higher figure, insisting that “we built hundreds of miles of border wall.”

The crux of the matter lies in defining exactly what each candidate deemed as new wall construction. Essentially, Christie referred to the ‘primary wall’ built where no previous barriers existed, a project that saw 52 miles of new border enforcement constructed. Pence’s assertion, however, unified all wall construction, consisting of both primary (new) and secondary (replacement) barrier. By this standard, the wall extended a total of 458 miles on the southern border under Trump, significantly higher than Christie’s claim.

A similar distortion of facts echoed from the debate stage when Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis was asked about his state’s new Black history curriculum. DeSantis pleaded innocent to the allegation that the curriculum incorporated a questionable clause which stated that slaves developed skills that, at times, redounded to their personal benefit. However, the clause did indeed form part of the new standards, a fact DeSantis did not acknowledge.

On energy matters, former South Carolina governor Haley accurately pointed out that DeSantis had indeed banned fracking within days of taking office, but not before a state constitutional amendment was enacted. The debate witnessed further contention on the topic of energy independence, with Pence ebullient about their administration’s accomplishments. Questionably, Pence glossed over the fact that America wasn’t entirely self-sufficient under Trump, as it still relied on imports of foreign oil and gas.

As the discourse progressed, the fact-checking necessary for such debates became increasingly evident. From Trump censuring Biden’s economic policies to former Vice President Mike Pence asserting illicit reduction in illegal immigration, the debaters’ claims – some substantiated, others not – painted an equally colorful and chaotic landscape of contemporary American politics.

Meanwhile, Trump himself steered clear of the California debate, opting instead for a public address in Michigan. He made several contentious remarks about Biden, including an unsubstantiated allegation of Biden receiving money from foreign entities, further highlighting the absence of dependable information in modern political discourse.

Given the complexity of political issues and the resultant wealth of information – both accurate and erroneous – fact-checking is increasingly critical in maintaining the integrity of public debates and aiding informed decision-making processes. An informed voter is the backbone of any flourishing democracy, and factual, accurate information is the lifeblood that nourishes this process.