Josep Borrell, the European Union’s policy chief, stands among those lending reassurance to Ukraine that its support from foreign bodies has not diminished amid increasing tension with Russia. As the EU foreign ministers convene in Kyiv, Russia is warned against banking on European fatigue concerning support for Ukraine.
This momentous occasion marks the inaugural time that such an assembly has been conducted outside of the EU bloc. Although Ukraine is not an EU member, its aspiration for membership remains steadfast. The assembly’s timing is pertinent, occurring just a day after US budget negotiations concluded without additional military funding for Ukraine.
Borrell has characterized the persistent war situation in Ukraine as an “existential crisis”, clarifying that “it’s an existential threat,” during the gathering. The EU’s ongoing financial commitment – over €70bn (£60bn) scheduled to be delivered within the next few years – is a testament to the bloc’s enduring support for Ukraine. Borrell envisions “sustainable and predictable” military support, and emphasizes the constant backing of prominent member states.
Equally vocal in showing support, French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna referred to Monday’s assembly as a demonstration of durable and unwavering support for Ukraine with the ultimate goal of victory. Moreover, she inoculated against Russian hope of capitalizing on the weariness of EU, promising lasting resolve.
Although the US’s recent budget agreement excluded $6bn (£4.92bn) dedicated to military aid for Kyiv, President Joe Biden reassured Ukraine of the US’s continued support, given the hefty $46bn (£37bn) military aid previously ratified. The Kremlin predicts an intensification of combat fatigue across Europe and the US while assuming continuous direct involvement from Washington.
Contrary to assumptions of dwindling support fueled by Russia, Ukraine is displaying noteworthy progress in countering Russian forces. Yet the pace of progress remains less than anticipated, prompting an increased reliance on diplomatic agility as an alternate strategy. Initiatives like those suggested by German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, involving strategies to shield Ukraine from assaults on its power grid, underline the necessity for innovative solutions.
Nonetheless, unanimity within the EU’s ranks shows signs of strain. Notable abstentions from the Kyiv assembly by Poland and Hungary, both countries with controversial stances towards Ukraine, have raised eyebrows. Recent political developments, such as a pro-Russian candidate’s victory in Slovakia’s parliamentary elections, further complicate the EU’s endeavor to foster universal agreement among its members. Yet as Foreign Minister Kuleba astutely observes, it remains “too early to judge” how these ripple effects will ultimately influence Ukraine’s current situation.
