DC’s Sports Betting Market Eyes Competitive Shift, Ending FanDuel’s Monopoly


In the heart of the United States capital, a seismic shift in the landscape of mobile sports wagering could be about to take place. After a recent legislative push by City Council member Kenyan McDuffie, Washington, DC is on the cusp of ushering in more than one mobile sports betting operator to conduct business within its borders. This proposed change was integrated into the city’s budget for the 2025 fiscal year, which received the green light on Tuesday. However, these plans will only go ahead if Mayor Muriel Bowser grants her approval.

Right now, the city’s online sports betting market is dominated by FanDuel, which has held a monopoly on mobile betting in the country’s capital. This powerful position was established in April when Flutter Entertainment’s unit took over the city’s online sports betting services. The city council had permitted Intralot – the self-same company lambasted for its management of the controversial GambetDC app – to outsource its responsibilities to a third party.

Follow us on Google News! ✔️

In contrast to this monopolistic scenario, last month witnessed the uniting of major representatives from synonymous companies, including BetMGM, Caesars Sportsbook, DraftKings, and Fanatics Betting & Gaming, along with a shared purpose. They stood before the Washington, DC City Council’s Committee Business and Economic Development Committee to voice their advocacy for a more multifaceted and competitive mobile sports betting field in the city.

Should the proposed liberalization of Washington’s sports wagering market proceed, FanDuel’s monopoly could be history, opening the floodgates for other familiar industry faces to forge their path into the city. BetMGM, with its base at Nationals Park, and Caesars Sportsbook, located at Capital One Arena, are already entrenched with retail sportsbooks at professional sporting venues within the city’s borders. These companies, along with their competitors DraftKings and Fanatics, would certainly vie for licenses if the District becomes more welcoming to mobile wagering competition.

However, the potential overhaul of the sports betting sector in the District may ultimately hinge on simple economics. FanDuel coughed up a considerable $5 million to take over the Intralot deal and has pledged a yearly $2 million to $4 million operating payment to the city. If other gaming entities are prepared to make similar fiscal commitments, the city could stand to gain significantly from expanding mobile betting.

On the flip side, the market dynamics for operators may temper enthusiasm for an expanded market. While it is true that Washington, DC is an attractive prospect for sportsbook firms, there are no absolute certainties about competitive threats to FanDuel. By comparison, in neighboring Virginia, FanDuel cradles a significant 40.14% market share, which surpasses the joint shares of DraftKings and BetMGM.

Meanwhile, the notion of opening up DC’s sports betting market could encounter resistance, particularly from small businesses boasting FanDuel-operated sports wagering kiosks. These retail units, spread across 63 locations throughout the city in bars and lottery outlets, have grown into crucial income sources for the establishments that host them. Retailers worry that more mobile wagering options might disincentivize bettors from frequenting their kiosks. To counter this, McDuffie suggests that other gaming companies could offer similar devices for businesses if the Washington market liberalizes.