Connecticut Court Overturns Suspension of Alex Jones’s Attorney in Sandy Hook Case

19

The verdant tendrils of justice took another twist in the sprawling and snarled litigation sprawling out from the infamous Sandy Hook school shooting, as a Connecticut court on Thursday made the dramatic decision to overturn a punitive six-month suspension handed down to an attorney involved in the case. The lawyer, Norman Pattis, who represents the conspiracy theorist, Alex Jones, had been subjected to suspension for his alleged mishandling of confidential medical records, in an unethical attempt to support Jones in his legal battle.

The Appellate Court, however, deemed that previous rulings had inaccurately applied professional conduct regulations against Pattis, consequently ordering a fresh hearing to take place under the scrutiny of a different judge. It is worth noting that the court still retained other aspects of the misconduct ruling in its decision.

Follow us on Google News! ✔️


It was Pattis who had been tasked with mounting a defence for Alex Jones when a plethora of the bereaved Sandy Hook families brought a lawsuit against him, accusing him of emotional distress and defamation for his persistent contentions that the appalling school shooting was, in reality, a carefully architected hoax. The veracity of Jones’s claims led to his followers launching a campaign of terror and harassment against the grieving families, plunging them into unnerving torment.

Pattis’s suspension was first instilled by trial judge Barbara Bellis in a chilly January of 2023. Incensed by Pattis’s inability to appropriately safeguard the families’ sensitive records – an oversight that clearly contravened an explicit court order – Bellis deemed the actions an “abject failure” and “inexcusable.” The order had circumscribed the access to these critical documents solely to the Connecticut lawyers.

Despite this chastisement, Pattis maintained his innocence, furrowing his brows at the accusations, and categorizing the release of the records as a regrettable yet innocent error. While the Appellate Court was further irking out its decision, Pattis’s suspension was temporarily put on hold.

Emerging from the hearing, Pattis expressed profound gratitude towards the appellate court panel, noting that the courtroom experience during the Jones trial had been unlike anything he had ever encountered. Attempts to solicit comments from Bellis and the state judicial branch have been ignored.

For the Connecticut case, Pattis had been granted access to almost an insurmountable number of legal documents—nearly 400,000 pages. Among these reams of text were around 4,000 pages of medical records, the sensitive nature of which have been hotly debated. At the behest of another Jones lawyer based in Texas, Pattis’s office dispatched an external hard drive containing the records. These documents were then shared among the legal team but were never exposed to the public’s gaze.